[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[mew-dist 26376] Re: "i" vs "T" on IMAP

To: mew-dist@xxxxxxx
Subject: [mew-dist 26376] Re: "i" vs "T" on IMAP
From: Kazu Yamamoto (山本和彦)
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 14:13:01 +0900 (JST)
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=omgo; d=iij.ad.jp; c=nofws; q=dns; h=date:message-id:to:from:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer: mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=xi2zaMmTo60oHXSyjmeWI65mziwjmPZhJ3oK2JQelaWEFnG/2l6lfQpKCG31s5X6t uVTQ7WC158FEoIdd9gJgQ==



> 4.2.50 に当ててみたところ、今度は I しても消えないような気がします。

環境を作って徹底的に検証しました。
今は、思うように動くのではないかと思います。

--かず

Follow-Ups:
- [mew-dist 26379] Re: "i" vs "T" on IMAP
  - From: 田原俊一

References:
- [mew-dist 26193] "i" vs "T" on IMAP
  - From: 田原俊一
- [mew-dist 26365] Re: "i" vs "T" on IMAP
  - From: 山本和彦
- [mew-dist 26367] Re: "i" vs "T" on IMAP
  - From: 田原俊一

Prev by Date: [mew-dist 26375] Re: Some hacks around summary column
Next by Date: [mew-dist 26377] Re: drag & drop on Meadow
Previous by thread: [mew-dist 26368] Re: "i" vs "T" on IMAP
Next by thread: [mew-dist 26379] Re: "i" vs "T" on IMAP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread